<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Adobe Photoshop goes online with Photoshop Express</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/</link>
	<description>Photography is for everyone.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Watson</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/#comment-106667</link>
		<dc:creator>John Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/review-adobe-photoshop-goes-online-with-photoshop-express/#comment-106667</guid>
		<description>Adobe has &lt;a href="https://www.photoshop.com/express/pxterms.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;revised their terms&lt;/a&gt; to address these issues. The new terms go into effect April 10, 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe has <a href="https://www.photoshop.com/express/pxterms.html" rel="nofollow">revised their terms</a> to address these issues. The new terms go into effect April 10, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Watson</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/#comment-104916</link>
		<dc:creator>John Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/review-adobe-photoshop-goes-online-with-photoshop-express/#comment-104916</guid>
		<description>Apparently Adobe has heard plenty of complaining about this issue. They've added an FAQ to say they're &lt;a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?forumid=74&#038;catid=684&#038;threadid=1349048&#038;enterthread=y" rel="nofollow"&gt;updating the terms&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Adobe has heard plenty of complaining about this issue. They&#8217;ve added an FAQ to say they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?forumid=74&#038;catid=684&#038;threadid=1349048&#038;enterthread=y" rel="nofollow">updating the terms</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/#comment-104828</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/review-adobe-photoshop-goes-online-with-photoshop-express/#comment-104828</guid>
		<description>for photos (and other media) submitted to other services than yahoo groups yahoo's tos say that the license granted only includes use etc "solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted or made available." (yahoo tos 9. b.)

that's by far not what is granted to adobe when accepting their tos ("... and to incorporate such Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed.", end of 8. a.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for photos (and other media) submitted to other services than yahoo groups yahoo&#8217;s tos say that the license granted only includes use etc &#8220;solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted or made available.&#8221; (yahoo tos 9. b.)</p>
<p>that&#8217;s by far not what is granted to adobe when accepting their tos (&#8221;&#8230; and to incorporate such Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed.&#8221;, end of 8. a.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Watson</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/#comment-104823</link>
		<dc:creator>John Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/review-adobe-photoshop-goes-online-with-photoshop-express/#comment-104823</guid>
		<description>You're right, Flickr specifically excludes photos and videos from their clause (I updated my comment). It's in the Yahoo terms which the Flickr terms are a supplement to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Flickr specifically excludes photos and videos from their clause (I updated my comment). It&#8217;s in the Yahoo terms which the Flickr terms are a supplement to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/#comment-104821</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/review-adobe-photoshop-goes-online-with-photoshop-express/#comment-104821</guid>
		<description>just had a look at flickr's tos but couldn't find any clause similar to this one...

Regarding "I’m pretty confident they’re not going to take my photos and sell prints to people without my permission." At least you allow them to do so by accepting those terms...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just had a look at flickr&#8217;s tos but couldn&#8217;t find any clause similar to this one&#8230;</p>
<p>Regarding &#8220;I’m pretty confident they’re not going to take my photos and sell prints to people without my permission.&#8221; At least you allow them to do so by accepting those terms&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Watson</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/#comment-104819</link>
		<dc:creator>John Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/review-adobe-photoshop-goes-online-with-photoshop-express/#comment-104819</guid>
		<description>Yah, that seems bad. I suppose it's because they're a commercial service and they need relicensing rights in order to put your photos in public galleries and on the Express home page. The clause doesn't affect you if you don't share your photos in a public Gallery. It'd be nice if they were more up front about it though. Flickr has a similar clause but specifically excludes photos. I'm no lawyer so I don't understand why one service needs it and the other doesn't. Different lawyers.

It comes down to how much you trust Adobe, I guess. I'm pretty confident they're not going to take my photos and sell prints to people without my permission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, that seems bad. I suppose it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re a commercial service and they need relicensing rights in order to put your photos in public galleries and on the Express home page. The clause doesn&#8217;t affect you if you don&#8217;t share your photos in a public Gallery. It&#8217;d be nice if they were more up front about it though. Flickr has a similar clause but specifically excludes photos. I&#8217;m no lawyer so I don&#8217;t understand why one service needs it and the other doesn&#8217;t. Different lawyers.</p>
<p>It comes down to how much you trust Adobe, I guess. I&#8217;m pretty confident they&#8217;re not going to take my photos and sell prints to people without my permission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/adobe-photoshop-express-review/#comment-104817</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/review-adobe-photoshop-goes-online-with-photoshop-express/#comment-104817</guid>
		<description>looks great... but have you read this: 

Taken from "Adobe Photoshop Express - General Terms" (https://www.photoshop.com/express/terms.html)

" [...]
8. Use of Your Content.

a. Adobe does not claim ownership of Your Content. However, with respect to Your Content that you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Services, you grant Adobe a worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable license to use, distribute, derive revenue or other remuneration from, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display such Content (in whole or in part) and to incorporate such Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed. 

b. [...]"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks great&#8230; but have you read this: </p>
<p>Taken from &#8220;Adobe Photoshop Express - General Terms&#8221; (https://www.photoshop.com/express/terms.html)</p>
<p>&#8221; [...]<br />
8. Use of Your Content.</p>
<p>a. Adobe does not claim ownership of Your Content. However, with respect to Your Content that you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Services, you grant Adobe a worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable license to use, distribute, derive revenue or other remuneration from, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display such Content (in whole or in part) and to incorporate such Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed. </p>
<p>b. [...]&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
