<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting the exposure right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/</link>
	<description>Photography is for everyone.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Millard</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-184982</link>
		<dc:creator>Millard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2007/03/23/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-184982</guid>
		<description>This is why we bracket and focus on different objects in the scene.  It never hurts to do a little burning and dodging in photoshop either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why we bracket and focus on different objects in the scene.  It never hurts to do a little burning and dodging in photoshop either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taavi</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-31965</link>
		<dc:creator>Taavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2007/03/23/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-31965</guid>
		<description>A slight HDR with 50% opacity over the layer with the normal exposure is my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A slight HDR with 50% opacity over the layer with the normal exposure is my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photodoto &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exposure blending tutorial</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-31818</link>
		<dc:creator>Photodoto &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exposure blending tutorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 05:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2007/03/23/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-31818</guid>
		<description>[...] posting Getting the Exposure Right, I received a quite a few questions about how I achieved the HDR (High Dynamic Range) version of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posting Getting the Exposure Right, I received a quite a few questions about how I achieved the HDR (High Dynamic Range) version of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Dalesandro</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-30532</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Dalesandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2007/03/23/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-30532</guid>
		<description>Another technique I like is slow shutter with flash. Even most point and shoots have a 'Night Shot' mode which flashes the foreground then holds the shutter open to grab the BG. It's better for night shots (of course) but in this situation I'm guessing it would net you something between photos 2 and 3.

I like your HDR image as well. I agree that too many of the HDR images (especially on flickr) are so overly done as to look very unnatural. Not like what I see thru my eyes at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another technique I like is slow shutter with flash. Even most point and shoots have a &#8216;Night Shot&#8217; mode which flashes the foreground then holds the shutter open to grab the BG. It&#8217;s better for night shots (of course) but in this situation I&#8217;m guessing it would net you something between photos 2 and 3.</p>
<p>I like your HDR image as well. I agree that too many of the HDR images (especially on flickr) are so overly done as to look very unnatural. Not like what I see thru my eyes at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bahi</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-30506</link>
		<dc:creator>Bahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2007/03/23/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-30506</guid>
		<description>I do like the HDR version you've come up with - works really well for me, never looking like it's part of the hyper-real HDR trend, which I hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like the HDR version you&#8217;ve come up with - works really well for me, never looking like it&#8217;s part of the hyper-real HDR trend, which I hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panthera</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-29950</link>
		<dc:creator>Panthera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2007/03/23/getting-the-exposure-right/#comment-29950</guid>
		<description>I would take the first pic in the list, and then adjust the shadows afterwards to make them a little more 'visible', but not too much; cause when they are too bright (like the last picture), the sunset looses the attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take the first pic in the list, and then adjust the shadows afterwards to make them a little more &#8216;visible&#8217;, but not too much; cause when they are too bright (like the last picture), the sunset looses the attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
