<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Nikon Capture NX, RAW processing software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/</link>
	<description>Photography is for everyone.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-160889</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-160889</guid>
		<description>I have used Capture NX 1.1 on an AMD 2.0GHz 1GB machine and found it easily fsat enough with my D50 and D200 compressed NEF files.  I don&#039;t do batch processing though, so I have no idea how that works.  I have used Capture NX 1.1 on my girlfriend&#039;s Pentium 3.2GHZ with 2gb of ram and find it hard to believe that it would be slow on other people&#039;s PCs.  It was very fast.  On my Mac Quad Pro with 4GB and 2.66 X4 it is insanely fast, including version 2.0 which was recently released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Capture NX 1.1 on an AMD 2.0GHz 1GB machine and found it easily fsat enough with my D50 and D200 compressed NEF files.  I don&#8217;t do batch processing though, so I have no idea how that works.  I have used Capture NX 1.1 on my girlfriend&#8217;s Pentium 3.2GHZ with 2gb of ram and find it hard to believe that it would be slow on other people&#8217;s PCs.  It was very fast.  On my Mac Quad Pro with 4GB and 2.66 X4 it is insanely fast, including version 2.0 which was recently released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-103550</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-103550</guid>
		<description>To Henry James:  the extra size is because CNX embeds a larger and higher-quality JPEG preview inside the NEF.  I do not know of any preference option (such as that offered by Aperture) to adjust this, but perhaps there is a hidden one somewhere.

Re the CNX browser: I avoid it.  I manage my pictures in iPhoto and pass selected NEF&#039;s to CNX for editing.  If I pre-generate a &quot;modified&quot; JPEG file using iPhoto I can then overwrite it using CNX, and so I see a single version of each photo while having multiple versions embedded inside the NEF.  Details follow:

Round-tripping from iPhoto to CNX
---------------------------------

Note: This was inspired by, and partly copied from, a post by Michel Corbin.  Corbin was concerned with Photoshop Elements, but the principles are similar, except that with CNX you can, and may well want to, save a modified NEF file in place of the iPhoto &quot;original&quot;, as described below; see:

  http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1017&amp;message=18641170

and following posts by the same author)

---------------------------------

Before beginning, select the Preferences menu, then Advanced, and select CNX as the external editor. I prefer to then select &quot;Edit photo using full screen&quot; as my default, since I do most editing there.

To process a RAW file:

a) In iPhoto&#039;s thumbnails view, right-click on image (ctrl-click if you have a 1-button mouse or trackpad) and select &quot;Edit in external editor.&quot; This will launch CNX. Note that invoking &quot;reprocess RAW&quot; is only needed if you have previously edited the file.

b) Return to iPhoto and edit the same file within iPhoto; do something simple like convert to sepia.  It doesn&#039;t matter what you do since the Modified file will be replaced.

Exit from full screen back to the thumbnails window, or advance to the next image in iPhoto, to save the modification as a JPG.

c) Return to CNX and edit the file.  You can create multiple versions of the image if you like; CNX does _non-destructive_ edits and saves the instructions that create them inside the NEF file.  This consumes virtually zero disk space, and preserves the information in the original NEF.  SImply invoking &quot;Save&quot; from CNX updates the NEF that lives inside the iPhoto library by adding in the list of edit steps.  This is a _big_ advantage of CNX relative to PSE---no file clutter.

d) Now use CNX to create and save a JPG for the &quot;usual&quot; iPhoto uses: printing, slide shows, emailing, incorporation in web sites, etc. (you could, of course, print directly from CNX if you like).

This is where it gets a little tricky.  When you save the JPG file in CNX, you have to navigate to the folder that contains the MODIFIED file that iPhoto made.  Saving your JPG (via &quot;save as&quot;) will replace the sepia file from above.

If you do not know where it is, use the &quot;reveal in Finder&quot; command that is available by right-clicking on the image in iPhoto.  For iPhoto 6 (but not 8), Joe&#039;s iPhoto Applescripts has a Reveal in Finder that allows selection of the original or modified file.

CAUTION - as you search for the Modified folder for your images, you will see that even before you save your image as a B&amp;W or Sepia, there is already a JPG in the file. Don&#039;t give in to the temptation of skipping the step and simply replacing the JPG that&#039;s already there. If you do, your processed JPG file will dissappear as soon as you enter full screen mode or try to re-edit the file.

e) Go back to iPhoto and you will notice that after a brief moment, the file displayed among the thumbnails will be replaced with your processed JPG file.

This workflow is quite nice in that it allows you to see only one image.  You can use iPhoto&#039;s Revert to Original function if you want to select a different CNX &quot;version&quot; to save as the JPG, or if you want to let iPhoto do the RAW conversion after all---the changes you made to the NEF are still there, though iPhoto does not see them.

REMINDER - never delete or add files to the iPhoto library directly, using the Mac &quot;Finder&quot; -- doing so will corrupt the library.  Replacing a file by another with the same name and type is safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Henry James:  the extra size is because CNX embeds a larger and higher-quality JPEG preview inside the NEF.  I do not know of any preference option (such as that offered by Aperture) to adjust this, but perhaps there is a hidden one somewhere.</p>
<p>Re the CNX browser: I avoid it.  I manage my pictures in iPhoto and pass selected NEF&#8217;s to CNX for editing.  If I pre-generate a &#8220;modified&#8221; JPEG file using iPhoto I can then overwrite it using CNX, and so I see a single version of each photo while having multiple versions embedded inside the NEF.  Details follow:</p>
<p>Round-tripping from iPhoto to CNX<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Note: This was inspired by, and partly copied from, a post by Michel Corbin.  Corbin was concerned with Photoshop Elements, but the principles are similar, except that with CNX you can, and may well want to, save a modified NEF file in place of the iPhoto &#8220;original&#8221;, as described below; see:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1017&#038;message=18641170" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1017&#038;message=18641170</a></p>
<p>and following posts by the same author)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Before beginning, select the Preferences menu, then Advanced, and select CNX as the external editor. I prefer to then select &#8220;Edit photo using full screen&#8221; as my default, since I do most editing there.</p>
<p>To process a RAW file:</p>
<p>a) In iPhoto&#8217;s thumbnails view, right-click on image (ctrl-click if you have a 1-button mouse or trackpad) and select &#8220;Edit in external editor.&#8221; This will launch CNX. Note that invoking &#8220;reprocess RAW&#8221; is only needed if you have previously edited the file.</p>
<p>b) Return to iPhoto and edit the same file within iPhoto; do something simple like convert to sepia.  It doesn&#8217;t matter what you do since the Modified file will be replaced.</p>
<p>Exit from full screen back to the thumbnails window, or advance to the next image in iPhoto, to save the modification as a JPG.</p>
<p>c) Return to CNX and edit the file.  You can create multiple versions of the image if you like; CNX does _non-destructive_ edits and saves the instructions that create them inside the NEF file.  This consumes virtually zero disk space, and preserves the information in the original NEF.  SImply invoking &#8220;Save&#8221; from CNX updates the NEF that lives inside the iPhoto library by adding in the list of edit steps.  This is a _big_ advantage of CNX relative to PSE&#8212;no file clutter.</p>
<p>d) Now use CNX to create and save a JPG for the &#8220;usual&#8221; iPhoto uses: printing, slide shows, emailing, incorporation in web sites, etc. (you could, of course, print directly from CNX if you like).</p>
<p>This is where it gets a little tricky.  When you save the JPG file in CNX, you have to navigate to the folder that contains the MODIFIED file that iPhoto made.  Saving your JPG (via &#8220;save as&#8221;) will replace the sepia file from above.</p>
<p>If you do not know where it is, use the &#8220;reveal in Finder&#8221; command that is available by right-clicking on the image in iPhoto.  For iPhoto 6 (but not 8), Joe&#8217;s iPhoto Applescripts has a Reveal in Finder that allows selection of the original or modified file.</p>
<p>CAUTION &#8211; as you search for the Modified folder for your images, you will see that even before you save your image as a B&amp;W or Sepia, there is already a JPG in the file. Don&#8217;t give in to the temptation of skipping the step and simply replacing the JPG that&#8217;s already there. If you do, your processed JPG file will dissappear as soon as you enter full screen mode or try to re-edit the file.</p>
<p>e) Go back to iPhoto and you will notice that after a brief moment, the file displayed among the thumbnails will be replaced with your processed JPG file.</p>
<p>This workflow is quite nice in that it allows you to see only one image.  You can use iPhoto&#8217;s Revert to Original function if you want to select a different CNX &#8220;version&#8221; to save as the JPG, or if you want to let iPhoto do the RAW conversion after all&#8212;the changes you made to the NEF are still there, though iPhoto does not see them.</p>
<p>REMINDER &#8211; never delete or add files to the iPhoto library directly, using the Mac &#8220;Finder&#8221; &#8212; doing so will corrupt the library.  Replacing a file by another with the same name and type is safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-102397</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-102397</guid>
		<description>Results amazing. Speed on Centrino Duo 2Gz 2 GB ram above average but guys remember this program not for 100 pictures at a time. Now i fixing my old photoshop edited photos with Capture NX...Bravo Nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Results amazing. Speed on Centrino Duo 2Gz 2 GB ram above average but guys remember this program not for 100 pictures at a time. Now i fixing my old photoshop edited photos with Capture NX&#8230;Bravo Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-98208</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-98208</guid>
		<description>I use NX with 3GB RAM on a machine with a single Intell Xeon 3Ghz chip and NX is painfully slow when it opens 14 bit files from my 12 megapixel D300.  These files are Nikon RAW and 13-14MB.  After editing and saving as RAW files and later reopening them at say 21MB sizes it takes an age and even longer to process the images.  This is not good enough!  BUT I love the Control Point tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use NX with 3GB RAM on a machine with a single Intell Xeon 3Ghz chip and NX is painfully slow when it opens 14 bit files from my 12 megapixel D300.  These files are Nikon RAW and 13-14MB.  After editing and saving as RAW files and later reopening them at say 21MB sizes it takes an age and even longer to process the images.  This is not good enough!  BUT I love the Control Point tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry James</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-77920</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-77920</guid>
		<description>I tried Capture NX and overall I liked it. What I don&#039;t like is that the saved NEF file is about 6-7 MB while the original NEF is about 5 MB. What to do? Any help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Capture NX and overall I liked it. What I don&#8217;t like is that the saved NEF file is about 6-7 MB while the original NEF is about 5 MB. What to do? Any help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-65944</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-65944</guid>
		<description>The problem with Photoshop (besides the horrific layers methodology which produces huge files sizes) is that while it is OK with global edits to a picture it has never worked out a method for applying local changes to a specific area of a picture. Having been left to fend for themselves in this area people have come up with all sorts of methods like layer masks, gradients etc. All sorts of elaborate books have been written outlining the most truncated of methods for the most basic of every day tasks. None of them work in any meaningful sense. Dont beleive me? Try selecting and editing a woman&#039;s hair for example. Enough said.

Capture NX U Point technology does to Photoshop what the telephone did to the carrier pidgeon. It simply wipes it off the face of the map.

As for Capture NX being slow, it never fails to make me laugh when I read people boasting of their professional credentials then informing us they have a PC with &quot;2 gig of ram&quot;. Please get a serious professional computer before you post any more comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Photoshop (besides the horrific layers methodology which produces huge files sizes) is that while it is OK with global edits to a picture it has never worked out a method for applying local changes to a specific area of a picture. Having been left to fend for themselves in this area people have come up with all sorts of methods like layer masks, gradients etc. All sorts of elaborate books have been written outlining the most truncated of methods for the most basic of every day tasks. None of them work in any meaningful sense. Dont beleive me? Try selecting and editing a woman&#8217;s hair for example. Enough said.</p>
<p>Capture NX U Point technology does to Photoshop what the telephone did to the carrier pidgeon. It simply wipes it off the face of the map.</p>
<p>As for Capture NX being slow, it never fails to make me laugh when I read people boasting of their professional credentials then informing us they have a PC with &#8220;2 gig of ram&#8221;. Please get a serious professional computer before you post any more comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-61861</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-61861</guid>
		<description>Capture NX runs very fast on my system; dual Pentium D 3gHz CPUs, .5 terabite HD, 4 GB RAM and 256MB Raedon graphics accelerator. I find access/control of the same filters that are in my D40X to afford great post-picture taking flexibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capture NX runs very fast on my system; dual Pentium D 3gHz CPUs, .5 terabite HD, 4 GB RAM and 256MB Raedon graphics accelerator. I find access/control of the same filters that are in my D40X to afford great post-picture taking flexibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-44934</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-44934</guid>
		<description>I am running a fairly competent machine: P3, 3.2 with 2 gig of memory and a Sapphire Radeon Pro AGP 8X video card with 128mb memory.

I am having one specific problem with Capture NX which makes it very difficult to use and I don&#039;t know where the bottleneck might be. 

When I click on a thumbnail to open the image full screen, the box comes on which says &quot;rendering&quot;.  It renders at a reasonable speed until it gets to about 70% and then it slows to a crawl.  The rendered image is fine when it is finally completed - but I&#039;m quite frustrated.

Does anyone have an idea as to what aspect of my hardware would be slowing the rendering this way - and only at the end?

BTW, I agree with other posters who say that the end result is quite good.  Sometimes I don&#039;t go even go to CS3.

Louise

Louise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running a fairly competent machine: P3, 3.2 with 2 gig of memory and a Sapphire Radeon Pro AGP 8X video card with 128mb memory.</p>
<p>I am having one specific problem with Capture NX which makes it very difficult to use and I don&#8217;t know where the bottleneck might be. </p>
<p>When I click on a thumbnail to open the image full screen, the box comes on which says &#8220;rendering&#8221;.  It renders at a reasonable speed until it gets to about 70% and then it slows to a crawl.  The rendered image is fine when it is finally completed &#8211; but I&#8217;m quite frustrated.</p>
<p>Does anyone have an idea as to what aspect of my hardware would be slowing the rendering this way &#8211; and only at the end?</p>
<p>BTW, I agree with other posters who say that the end result is quite good.  Sometimes I don&#8217;t go even go to CS3.</p>
<p>Louise</p>
<p>Louise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ver Pana</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-37654</link>
		<dc:creator>Ver Pana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-37654</guid>
		<description>I have read many differing reviews about the capture NX and I am amazed at people having different experiences in their use of this software. For one I believe that Capture NX is truly slow but how slow is it depends on many factors. One is the amount of memory, the other would be the working status or health of the computer operating system, and lastly but equally important is the user&#039;s knowledge of the software. One&#039;s knowledge or proficiency in using one software is not a yardstick to be immediately proficient in using the other. The same thing is true to the amount of memory. For no matter how high the capacity of your RAM if your unit&#039;s operating system is sluggish due to registry errors, adwares and what have you, affects your work. These things greatly contribute to the differing reviews otherwise why is one&#039;s experience differs from the others? At this time the Capture NX can be considered as still in its infancy stage, but be that as it may, and while it is slow, it already delivers some stunning results in most users&#039; experience. For now there are only two things to consider and to choose from. If you want speed, this is not your software, otherwise if you have patience and want quality by all means use the Capture NX. The decision is yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read many differing reviews about the capture NX and I am amazed at people having different experiences in their use of this software. For one I believe that Capture NX is truly slow but how slow is it depends on many factors. One is the amount of memory, the other would be the working status or health of the computer operating system, and lastly but equally important is the user&#8217;s knowledge of the software. One&#8217;s knowledge or proficiency in using one software is not a yardstick to be immediately proficient in using the other. The same thing is true to the amount of memory. For no matter how high the capacity of your RAM if your unit&#8217;s operating system is sluggish due to registry errors, adwares and what have you, affects your work. These things greatly contribute to the differing reviews otherwise why is one&#8217;s experience differs from the others? At this time the Capture NX can be considered as still in its infancy stage, but be that as it may, and while it is slow, it already delivers some stunning results in most users&#8217; experience. For now there are only two things to consider and to choose from. If you want speed, this is not your software, otherwise if you have patience and want quality by all means use the Capture NX. The decision is yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tc</title>
		<link>http://photodoto.com/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-12183</link>
		<dc:creator>Tc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/07/07/review-nikon-capture-nx-raw-processing-software/#comment-12183</guid>
		<description>Gary.  Mine is a Core Duo processor and is very slow.  But it is bacause my Mac has to convert it.  Funny, but my 133MHz G4 Mac is way, way quicker!!
Tc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary.  Mine is a Core Duo processor and is very slow.  But it is bacause my Mac has to convert it.  Funny, but my 133MHz G4 Mac is way, way quicker!!<br />
Tc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

